Bug ID 510792: Upgrade fail for access policy macrocall rule Caption is not identical to caption of terminalout

Last Modified: May 01, 2019

Bug Tracker

Affected Product:  See more info
BIG-IP APM, Install/Upgrade(all modules)

Known Affected Versions:
11.4.1, 11.6.0, 11.6.0 HF1, 11.6.0 HF2, 11.6.0 HF3, 11.6.0 HF4, 11.6.0 HF5, 11.6.0 HF6, 11.6.0 HF7, 11.6.0 HF8, 11.6.1, 11.6.1 HF1, 11.6.1 HF2, 11.6.2, 11.6.2 HF1, 11.6.3, 11.6.3.1, 11.6.3.2, 11.6.3.3, 11.6.3.4, 11.6.4, 12.0.0, 12.0.0 HF1, 12.0.0 HF2, 12.0.0 HF3, 12.0.0 HF4, 12.1.0, 12.1.0 HF1, 12.1.0 HF2, 12.1.1, 12.1.1 HF1, 12.1.1 HF2, 12.1.2, 12.1.2 HF1, 12.1.2 HF2, 12.1.3, 12.1.3.1, 12.1.3.2, 12.1.3.3, 12.1.3.4, 12.1.3.5, 12.1.3.6, 12.1.3.7, 12.1.4, 12.1.4.1, 13.0.0, 13.0.0 HF1, 13.0.0 HF2, 13.0.0 HF3, 13.0.1, 13.1.0, 13.1.0.1, 13.1.0.2, 13.1.0.3, 13.1.0.4, 13.1.0.5, 13.1.0.6, 13.1.0.7, 13.1.0.8, 13.1.1, 13.1.1.1, 13.1.1.2, 13.1.1.3, 13.1.1.4, 13.1.1.5

Opened: Mar 05, 2015
Severity: 3-Major

Symptoms

During upgrade to v11.6.0 or later, the configuration load may fail due to the following error. "01071203:3: Caption (Failure) of the rule in macrocall (/Common/mc-1) must be identical to the caption (Caption) of terminalout. Unexpected Error: Validating configuration process failed

Impact

Configuration load failure occurs at upgrade.

Conditions

This happens when loading a configuration file that was saved by pre-v11.6.0 onto v11.6.0 (or later) with an policy access-policy of type macro where there are terminal-out items, but the "priority" order does not match the order of the rules in the corresponding apm policy policy-item that makes the macrocall.

Workaround

To work around the problem, manually edit the config so the priority order matches the rule order for captions.

Fix Information

None

Behavior Change