Bug ID 511819: Using replace-all-with to modify a rule list doesn't work if you specify an existing rule name

Last Modified: Mar 17, 2021

Bug Tracker

Affected Product:  See more info
BIG-IP AFM(all modules)

Known Affected Versions:
11.6.0, 11.6.0 HF1, 11.6.0 HF2, 11.6.0 HF3, 11.6.0 HF4, 11.6.0 HF5, 11.6.0 HF6, 11.6.0 HF7, 11.6.0 HF8, 11.6.1, 11.6.1 HF1, 11.6.1 HF2, 11.6.2, 11.6.2 HF1, 11.6.3, 11.6.3.1, 11.6.3.2, 11.6.3.3, 11.6.3.4, 11.6.4, 11.6.5, 11.6.5.1, 11.6.5.2, 11.6.5.3, 12.0.0, 12.0.0 HF1, 12.0.0 HF2, 12.0.0 HF3, 12.0.0 HF4

Opened: Mar 11, 2015
Severity: 3-Major

Symptoms

Using replace-all-with to modify a rule list doesn't work if you specify an existing rule name. The system attempts to modify the existing rule.

Impact

Difficulty modifying the rule list.

Conditions

Rule list, attempt to replace-all-with and specify a rule name that exists.

Workaround

When using replace-all-with, use new rule names.

Fix Information

None

Behavior Change