Bug ID 757822: Subroutine name should use partition name and policy name

Last Modified: Apr 17, 2024

Affected Product(s):
BIG-IP APM(all modules)

Known Affected Versions:
14.1.0, 14.1.0.1, 14.1.0.2, 14.1.0.3, 14.1.0.5, 14.1.0.6, 14.1.2, 14.1.2.1, 14.1.2.2, 14.1.2.3, 14.1.2.4, 14.1.2.5, 14.1.2.6, 14.1.2.7, 14.1.2.8, 14.1.3, 14.1.3.1, 14.1.4, 14.1.4.1, 14.1.4.2, 14.1.4.3, 14.1.4.4, 14.1.4.5, 14.1.4.6, 14.1.5, 14.1.5.1, 14.1.5.2, 14.1.5.3, 14.1.5.4, 14.1.5.6, 15.1.0, 15.1.0.1, 15.1.0.2, 15.1.0.3, 15.1.0.4, 15.1.0.5, 15.1.1, 15.1.2, 15.1.2.1, 15.1.3, 15.1.3.1, 15.1.4, 15.1.4.1, 15.1.5, 15.1.5.1, 15.1.6, 15.1.6.1, 15.1.7, 15.1.8, 15.1.8.1, 15.1.8.2, 15.1.9, 15.1.9.1, 15.1.10, 15.1.10.2, 15.1.10.3, 15.1.10.4

Fixed In:
15.0.0

Opened: Feb 06, 2019

Severity: 3-Major

Symptoms

When you create API per-request policy using the same name as a policy from another partition, BIG-IP generates an error similar to the following: java.net.ProtocolException: status:400, body:{"code":400,"message":"transaction failed:01070734:3: Configuration error: DB validation exception, unique constraint violation on table (subroutine_properties) object ID (/TST/svc1-my_auth svc1-my_prp). A duplicate value was received for a non-primary key unique index field. DB exception text (Cannot update_indexes/checkpoint DB object, class:subroutine_properties status:13)","errorStack":[],"apiError":2}.

Impact

Import / export functionality fails.

Conditions

-- Configure an API protection per-request policy in one partition with the same name as a policy in another partition. -- Attempt to import or export the policy.

Workaround

Ensure that names for API protection per-request policies are unique.

Fix Information

The name generated for API protection per-request policies now uses partition name combined with the policy name, so the issue no longer occurs.

Behavior Change

Guides & references

K10134038: F5 Bug Tracker Filter Names and Tips